Mitt Romney stops off in Iowa to walk around in a cornfield.
On the trail with Mitt Romney: Iowa
-
Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:34 PM EDT
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead. (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul) |
The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell airs at 10pm ET, Monday through Thursday on MSNBC. The show channels O'Donnell's extensive background in politics and entertainment.
Sign up for SMS alerts on your phone. Text "LAST" to 622639 and you'll start getting messages from the show.
To stop the text messages, text STOP to 622639 to quit, or HELP for more info (must be in all caps). Message and data rates may apply. Check with your respective carrier for more details.
We're also on GetGlue. Download the app for your phone and start checking in to earn badges and major props from us.
More dialogue captured from a secret directional mike plus a bug planted in one of the cornstalks...
Mitt: Okay, so I got the Kevin Costner "Field of Dreams" and the "If I build it they will come" idea down okay. Then it's off to the Dakotas for another Costner reference where we go for the Native American and conservation votes by hanging out with some Indians and wolves, right?
Adviser: That's right, sir. And be sure to call them Lakotas, not Lamanites...
Be happy that Romney chose Ryan. He moves to the right and less change of winning in November. He has no choice. Those who oppose any kind of support for social security and medicare told him to choose Ryan. Now we know for sure that the right wing of the Republican Party want to cancel social security and meicare.
Why hasn't Mr. Romney paid taxes into the country he is trying NOW to run? Hmm. Indeed. He has not contributed and he [as I said before] has set himself up as a foreign investor in his own country as a tax loophole. THIS is why he refuses to show them because it is HIM who is truly foreign NOT President Obama. Mr. Romney is a foreign investor to his own country. He formed a group with 6 others to do so more then a few years back.
Veep? No one cares they have both already lost long before it started. It has been chosen by those who are actually calling the shots period. The Goper's have done themselves in as a penance for there atrocities over the economy under the previous administration...
You don't go from zero to CRAZY in under one second on accident folks...
Cheers
Is Romney mentally ill? I am not trying to be funny. Watch his expression and some of what he says can only be immagined. Just like a mentally ill person who immagines that some terrible disaster is going to happen when there are a few clouds in the sky. I would like to know, especially from someone who has a knowledge of psychoatry.
Poor Mitt...his remarks in the Iowa cornfield only fell on deaf and shriveled ears...very much like those of his base.
I'm still waiting for the local yokels assembled on this blog to yuk it up over the obvious "If they don't have cornbread, let them eat cake!"
Looks like your wait is over, Keith. It seems you're the only who went there...obviously.
Well done...
Who is "the real" Mitt Romney? This candidate has more personalities than "Sybil!"
They have a lot of cows in Wisconsin, but they also grow some corn up in those parts. Last I looked they aren't growin corn in the urban Chicago area and Deleware, but do grow corn as an important agriculure crop in cental and western Massachusetts (where Romney served as Governor and his homestate) and in rural Wisconsin, from where Ryan is a 7 term congressman. Which tiket would naturally have the most knowledge of the farmers needs and particularly corn production then, city boys Obama/Biden or Romney/Ryan?
Nuff said!
Arrgghh...somebody let you in on the secret, didn't they?
So Mitt does a walk-about in a cornfield...in your eyes, that must make him fully vetted to be President...really setting the bar low, aren't you? But that low bar could have applied equally to any of the Republican wanna-be's from the GOP primaries. Sounds like you're trying to give Mitt credit for any corn that grows in MA. Just maybe, he can recognize and identify corn better than he can all those "hardware items" he had in his bucket...you remember...the ones he had just purchased from a "hardware store", but didn't seem to know what they were.
It appears your hero evidently doesn't have the cojones to call those boys he was auditioning for VP personally to tell them that he'd made another choice, but instead, sent one of his sons to tell them. It seems that not only does he not have a core, but he doesn't have much of a backbone either. Must have something to do with that "I love to fire people..." mantra of his. I think I saw a look of profound relief on Portman's face when asked about it...not quite sure about T-paw.
One can only hope that you'll follow your own dictum and spare us from more of your blather hero worship of Mitt. But I'll put that the prospects of that happening right up there with Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy.
Another piece of cake, Keith?
Err...Eyes Wide Shut, Mitt Romney as Governor of Massachusetts oversaw his cabinet Secreretary of Food and Agriculture's progamming, I'll have you know, and is well versed in the issues of agriculture from that leadership experience.
And Ryan, as Chair of the House Budget committee he has been responsible for helping to develop and steering every federal Agriculture Department budget.
BTW, Obama was shooting his lying mouth off in Iowa today, claiming Paul Ryan was topping a Agriculture relief bill. Truth is, the House, now in recess, had passed their Agriculture relief bill two weeks ago, and await the Senate, which is in session, to take up their bill or pass one of their own so that the two competing bills can go to conferenence committee, the way legislation is worked on and? past in our Congress. So who is the demogoging liar here? No diference in the Obama campaign style yet that I can see.
You can fool some of the people all of the time, you can fool all of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.
And the American people won't be fooled again, as the song went!
What you say has no bearing on the agricultural aspects of growing corn in MA. Romney didn't "make it happen"...there are far smarter people than him in MA who actually know about agriculture.
You speak of a "...demogoging liar". Two things...first, the actual word you were fruitlessly trying to say is actually a form of "demagogue". Second, Ryan and Romney have been out lying recently about a $700M cut that Obama allegedly made in Medicare and dropping a work requirement for welfare. Even other Republicans are calling them falsehoods. I can see why both sides are happy about Ryan being picked, but I clearly understand why some GOP members are rightfully worried about him as a sidekick, and have said so.
Just more lies in a seemingly endless line for Mitt...and his new VP boy is parroting him. Between Mitt's flip-flops and his lies, I really have to question the saneness of anybody who would actually consider him for the top job.
Seems the GOP budget proposed a $30B cut in farm subsidies and guess who put that budget forward? Paul Ryan. Knowing that you won't believe it, I, unlike you, will provide you with the relevant link. If you still refuse to face the facts, it will only confirm that you've lost your rudder.
http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/food/2011-04-11-farm-subsidies-gop-budget.htm
And, it's been reported by AgWeek that the Ryan budget you speak so highly of would cut $180B over 10 years from farm bill programs. Another link for you to weep over and it only proves that Ryan's actions are not likely to make the agricultural group rabid supporters of the guy.
http://www.agweek.com/event/article/id/19669/
With these two Republican poster boys, the last part of that old saw doesn't seem to apply to the GOP base. I can offer you as a shining example of that. Luckily, many people are smarter than that...and they vote.
Guess I missed the memo that appointed you as a general spokesman for the "American people". Oh, that's right...you weren't.
The farm bill cuts attack the corporate welfare built into the Agriculture system that go primarily to the huge agri-business concerns. Take away the subsidies for ethanol, an immoral way to use tax or borrowed dollars to promote the turning of a food product into fuel additives, and you have that $30 billion, Eye's Wide Shut.
The US Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack has stated that despite the drought, this year the Agriculture Department expects the corn crop to be our 3rd largest ever, as family famers and agri-business put more acreage to corn than in any other time expecting that the green energy Obama Administration would be subidizing ethanol production in larger numbers than ever before. And now the little side game goes on of the talking down the crop so that the Wall Street bankers and hedge funds push up the price of corn to astronominical levels thru teh commodity futures markets, although they have no intention of ever taking possession of so much a one bushel. Who gets hurt in this, none other than the consumer and the tax payer...which is, really, "the same difference", as Yogi Berra would say.
Stop soaking up the taking points, Eye's Wide Shut, and learn to read in between the lines, and then think for yourself. Then you might be able to mount a cogent arguement here.
BTW, when I leased 200 acres of Western Massachusetts farmland while working for the VA in Central-Western Massachusetts, I raised corn, primarily for stand sales, feed for my chickens, and family use. I think I know a bit more about corn than you do. And the stuff they utilize for ethanol production and for cattle feed is not the yellow stuff, but the green plant itself. So showing off shriveled poorly developed ears of corn from a non irrigate field is not exactly a definition of the expected losses of our corn crop to come. I know about irrigationl....I had to irrigate mine, even in usually drought free New England.
You should take your own advice...it might even help your dire cause, but I don't think I'll live long enough to see you do that. You were the one who was extolling Ryan for his "budget" work on behalf of farmers but when it's pointed out to you that (SHOCK!), Mr. Ryan actually didn't bring the bill up this session and had previously cut the ag budget like he had, you try to deflect the conversation to a GOP talking point about subsidies for Ethanol??? Deflection just isn't a trait you'll ever master, Keith, but do keep trying...the comedy it produces is almost priceless.
Well, if you want to bring up subsidies, what about the Republicans love affair with the oil industry? Funny...Ryan didn't see fit to cut anything about that in his budget(s). You can't only pick and choose salient points to argue without the threat of stepping into something deeper. For a self-described "learned" man, you have sown the seeds of doubt in some of us as to the accuracy of that self-promoted attribute.
Let's see...Mr. Ryan also voted for TARP, so he's obviously not against bank bail-outs and if memory serves, he also supported the Detroit bail-out, unlike his all-too-apparent shallow running mate, who's now trying to claim credit for it's success. More of that "retroactively" stuff that Mitt is so fond of lately, it appears.
Wow...with these two guys of yours, you just can't make this stuff up...they're naturals at it.
Are we talking about your mind, Keith? With all your blather and deflection tactics, it could obviously use a good periodic flush.