
Moonlite Bunny Ranch
Bunnies flashing their "Pimpin for Paul" signs (file).
Ron Paul’s libertarian ideals have found a lasting home at the Moonlite Bunny Ranch. Prostitutes at the Nevada-based establishment have embraced Ron Paul yet again as their choice for president, according to brothel owner and star of HBO's "Cathouse," Dennis Hof.
Newt Gingrich came in at a close second. According to the Daily Caller, Hof said, "We thought real closely about supporting Gingrich — because he's a cheater — and we like cheaters."
While extra-martial affairs may be good for the oldest business around, he said they "decided to go with the guy that's more about state's rights — and that's Ron Paul." About 500 "bunnies" at the ranch were surveyed.
Nevada allows counties to license brothels, so it's technically not illegal there.
As part of their "Pimpin for Paul" campaign to raise money for the Republican candidate, the ranch is offering a two-for-one deal on bunnies during the month of January.





Seems to demonstrate the level of informed electorate Mr Paul seems to attract. But hay it's understandable that a prostitute would want their labors to be as main stream as a Wal mart greeter's is but sorry Ron Paul the Republican is not in that kind of party. And while these ladies may well have serviced many a man whose public self righteous indignation at their chosen "Profession" makes them want to out their particular proclivities it won't change their work status in society and neither will Big Pimping Paul.
See who is REALLY behind the entire "Pimping for Paul" smear campaign:
See who is REALLY behind the entire "Pimping for Paul" smear campaign:
Youtube Search - "Pimping for Paul: A Case Study in Media Bias"
#!
HERE's THE TRUTH
Dear Mr. O’Donnell,
Right when I want to give you credit for being fair in your reporting, you take that opportunity away from me. Today I watched you graciously defend Dr. Ron Paul from inaccurate reporting by the AP regarding Paul’s spending on air flight tickets. You clarified that important information was left out of their report which gave the appearance that Paul improperly spent tax payers’ money on first class tickets. You explained in the end that although you wanted the AP story to be true, you couldn’t find where Paul had mismanaged tax payers’ money. Your admission that you
wanted the story to be true is very revealing about your motives.
But I thought you were fair until you later reported the “Pimpin’ for Paul” story. You told two women prostitutes who supported Paul that he wrote derogatory comments about Martin Luther King and then you asked the women if they still supported him. I call that ambush journalism. You never told the women that Paul allegedly
wrote those words. Instead, you stated that he wrote those words without confirming the accuracy of those quotes. Paul has continuously denied writing the
negative newsletters and recently, a real reporter investigated the history
of those newsletters and discovered the gentleman who most likely wrote the
negative comments about King. Reading a quote that Paul did not write to humiliate him was no different than the unfair reporting by the AP.
You knew what you were doing. You set out to demonize Paul and anyone who
doesn’t subscribe to your views. I believe this attack came because many Independents and Democrats support Ron Paul. Why else would you go through such pains to assassinate Paul’s character?
Paul is one of a few true statesmen that we have left in this country. He is trying to educate more people on why liberty is essential to US citizens. All the man has said is that we must learn to respect each other’s views, even if we don’t believe in their views. For this, some call him a racist or an anti-Semite. I don’t agree with the
views of a Klan person or an Atheist but does that mean I have to disrespect
their right to believe as they like? Freedom of speech allows me to debate with them but I can’t force them to think as I do.
I’ve seen you compliment Ron Paul for defending Muslims who were demonized by many neo-conservative Republicans. You know that Paul is not a racist but you
continue to spread this propaganda. I’m getting sick of people being accused of being racist because they have a different view about issues that affect us. Although there are people who hate others for their race or religion, I would still like to think that I can build bridges with people who don’t see things my way. BUT people like you keep
stirring the pot of racism and anti-Semitism. If you call someone a racist, an uninformed fool watching your program believes it.
Your attacks are disgraceful and I will have to stop watching your television show. And
people like you wonder why people like me listen to alternative media networks
on the Internet? We’re sick of your negative reporting. You speak for the 1%
you profess to oppose. You’re intellectually dishonest.
I see no use for government if doesn't work for the people and I see no use in paying Ron Paul or his son for their hypocritical stances while essentially doing the exact same thing every other government officials does....spend government money. In fact I have more respect for the congressmen who doesn't hide behind arcane parliamentary procedures to maintain a stance of false superiority and fake transparency. Ron Paul is a crusty old curmudgeon with a monetary policy similar to Gollum in Lord of the rings ..........My precious!
lol, cut through the bull@!$%# and say how you really feel.
You want to claim hypocritical stances, name it out.
In fact I have more respect for people who don't hide behind unbacked accusations and insinuations to maintain ignorance.
I find Ron Paul to be too extreme in his views. He is so much for freedom and liberty that he really believes it is up to the owner of the property to decide who can or cannot frequent their establishment. In other words he would be fine with the "whites only" sign in the window.
Why yes he would and if you give him a gold coin he will look the other way if you drag a child on your property and keep him for yourself.
The constitution specifically protects private property. If you don't like that portion of the Constitution, don't kill the messenger.
I tell you what try owning me and see how long you keep breathing but no worries I'll be sure and slip a copy of the constitution in your cold dead hands.
I'm glad that the issue of legalising prostitution (aka consensual sex) got at least some sort of visibility. Please more of that.
However, I really dislike that the leftish media focus so much on the Repuglicans. Also, they keep praising Obama as the lesser of two evils while totally ignoring all the other alternatives. I wish the leftish media would finally start paying attention to third parties, e.g. the Green Party of the United States or the Socialist Party USA. Stop sucking up to the pseudo-left Democrats.
hahaha, when I saw Lawrence say he was going to interview the Bunny Ranch, I just knew it was going to end badly.
Just by inviting them to the show in itself was the start of the hit ..... it never was going to end pretty!
Dear Mr. O'Donnell,
I found your story last night at best sexist and insensitive. Women who are involved in prostitution are repressed and abused. There is no obvious humor to be found in that. Their coached replies as they agreed with their pimp on National TV was far too pertinent to be satire. The 'good old boy' jocularity displayed by their pimp and responded in kind by you was degrading to all women everywhere. There is satire to be found in all politics, but this was smarmy, oppressive, patriarchal cliche at it's very worst. I am disappointed in you and your show for embracing such chauvinism. If this seems a harsh criticism on your attempt at satire, please imagine the same segment with male prostitutes and a female pimp. Is it still funny, or just sickening? I have been a proud watcher of your show, but this is beyond disappointing from someone of your journalistic integrity.
I am not sure if the segment was smarmy or oppressive. I felt that there was a bit of an "Ick factor" to it. it was not a coincidence that it was one guy with 2 women...
If there had to be an interview of the trio I wish it had been used to highlight the critical issue of women's reproductive rights...and the stance of the GOP candidates on it..
Why is it that EVERYONE can see the threat from Iran, a country which MIGHT get nuclear weapons in the next 10 years but would have to deliver their ONLY warhead using a steam powered wooden rocket? Even if they were to do so successfully, a first generation warhead could kill maybe 50,000 people, whereupon the entire surface of Iran would be converted to craters and molten slag.
Why is it those same people CANNOT see the national security implications of a 16 trillion dollar debt and 100 trillion in unfunded liabilities? There are at least three countries now that could, if they desired sell off enough T-Bills, Mortgage backed securities and other cash equivalents to cause a crash in the dollar – thereby effectively cutting off imports like oil and gas, without which our transportation infrastructure will crash.
Did you know supermarkets only keep about 3 days worth of food on hand? Imagine there’s no diesel available and all the trucks are idled for a few weeks. Can you spell national emergency and martial law?
Did you know the loss of manufacturing in the US has left us dependent upon foreign powers for vital raw and finished materials? It takes YEARS to open a mine or a factory due to federal regulations.
You need to vote for Ron Paul, but if you can’t do that then for heaven’s sake store a couple of months of dry food.
Vote Vertebrate – Ron Paul is the only choice consistent with the principles of self preservation. Think of your family.
Iranian folks are one of the most kindest culture's. seen it 1979-1986
It makes me so disappointed to hear Rick Santorum, Newt and Mitt so hell bent on bombing a country with millions of people that are and HAVE been kind people for ages.
Just because their Gov Sucks we should bomb them? Thats it? the people are beautiful! Do you really think Iran would start a war with the U.S. and risk a massive retaliation that would kill millions of their own? NOT Hardly! Does our Congress really think that we are that stupid to believe Iran would?
...Just look at our pathetic Government!
Barrows money, to so called Nation build, to raid territory , to start wars with the weapons that the company lockheed makes, whom all of our congress has millions of personal dollars of their own money in the company's stock, and our kids are sent off to die! FOR WHAT? FREEDOM B.S. try Greed! If it was about freedom would we have censorship on our media? or the internet?
(Hilliary Clinton $35million) (John Kerry $30 million) (B. Obama $12 million)(Nancy Pelosi $65million) and the list goes on and on just from 2002 - 2010!
So, what do you think others human being's on the planet think of our Government? To make matters worse our Gov is owned by the corporations (Bain, Goldmen Sacks, Boeing, Monsanto, Lockheed, Boeing) to buy the media off to paint a picture of our congress as humanitarian's! What a joke! but Oh so TRUE!
One guy People , ONE So called Stupid old Man by the media, will put an end to the vial hostile behavior of this nasty devious congress and he is running for president of the USA at the age of 76!
He left in THE MIDDLE OF A PRESIDENTIAL RACE To Vote Against adding ANOTHER 1.4 Trillion to the US debt! While the other Wh@res are conning you for your votes!
One Man was not here courting you, he was in D.C. fighting for us.
THIS IS A SMEAR CAMPAIGN. This is despicable.
Here's the Truth:
#!